bridging

Within the finite boundaries of the lattice, there is a fluidity of factoral interpretation possible, which allows categorical perception of intervals and interchangeability between various different rational designations of particular categorical intervals.

This is made possible by means of small intervals, such as various schismas, which Margo Schulter has named "xenharmonic bridges". According to my theory, these bridges allow interpretation of a ratio's factors to change from one set of primes to another, without affecting the prime-affect experienced by the listener. I call this fluidity of prime-affect "bridging".

In my notation, the bridge is indicated by writing the prime-limit of the lower-limit system on the left, followed by two 'equal signs', with the prime-limit of the higher-limit system on the right; for example: the interval which Fokker considered to be a bridge between the 5- and 7-limit systems, 224:225 [= 2⁵7¹:3²5² = 0.07 Semitone = ~ 7.712 cents], would be notated by me as a 5==7 bridge.

A designation as a particular bridge is in itself still a categorical designation, since there is an infinite number of small intervals which could be perceived as being any one particular bridge.

see also xenharmonic bridge, and Margo Schulter's essay on the subject.

[from Joe Monzo, JustMusic: A New Harmony]

---

(to download a zip file of the entire Dictionary, click here)

For many more diagrams and explanations of historical tunings, see my book. If you don't understand my theory or the terms I've used, start here

I welcome feedback about this webpage: corrections, improvements, good links. Let me know if you don't understand something. return to the Microtonal Dictionary index return to my home page return to the Sonic Arts home page